Corante

About this Author
Gwen Smith Ishmael, Sr. Vice President of Insights and Innovation at Decision Analyst in Arlington, TX, has led marketing and new product development activities in the CPG and technology industries since 1986. She also conceived and developed ground-breaking Web-based promotional vehicles, two of which are patent pending. Gwen holds an MBA in Marketing and is a featured speaker on insights and innovation around the world. Her writings have been featured in international text books, most recently in Managing 4 Ps of Marketing FMCG Sector, and Product Innovation: A Strategic Tool for Growth, by ICFAI Publications, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

Founding Author

Renee Hopkins Callahan Renee Hopkins Callahan started IdeaFlow and serves as chief blog-wrangler. She is Director of Innovation Services at Decision Analyst in Arlington, Texas, is a former journalist who worked as an editor and reporter for The Dallas Morning News and the Nashville Tennessean, and was managing editor of D, the Dallas city magazine. She has a master's degree in rhetoric and has also taught college-level English and informal logic.

IdeaFlow

Category Archives

March 26, 2007

Jack’s Notebook: A Business Novel of ‘Deliberate Creativity’

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

JacksNotebook.jpgJack’s Notebook author Gregg Fraley is the type of person who would ask a Starbucks barista – one he didn’t know – “What is your dream?” When he started researching Jack’s Notebook, he did just that. And, he said in a recent interview, “Not a single person said ‘Oh, I really want to be a waiter’ – they’d say ‘I’d like to start a business,’ or ‘I’d like to be involved in this industry.’

Jack’s Notebook, according to Fraley, is intended for people like that Starbucks barista – people who are starting a business or are new to business world. But that’s not to say it doesn’t have business relevance – Jack’s Notebook would resonate with anyone who needs to deal with change in their lives or their business (which is to say pretty much anyone). Fraley’s examples: Anybody who’s thinking about a career change; anybody who wants to do a better job of problem solving in their business.

Jack’s Notebook is a novel, a business fable inspired formatically by the works of Patrick Lenicioni and Eliyahu Goldratt. Said Fraley, “Narrative brings an emotional component, and when there’s an emotional component, people learn better. Stories are a very human way to learn. People see themselves in the characters…they think, oh, it could happen to me – or thank God that hasn’t happened to me!”

Jack’s Notebook is an elegant balance of imagination and analysis. The imagination reaches out and takes hold of the reader, while the accompanying analysis, which could bog down the story, instead feeds the reader’s curiosity about what the power that this CPS creative problem solving process seems to have. The analysis also could be somewhat comforting for readers who are more likely to be analytical than imaginative.

“It’s the natural tendency of people who are raised in the ‘one right answer’ to focus on analysis,” said Fraley. “We are not trained to be more imaginative. We don’t practice it. We might do art every other Friday if it’s raining – arts and music are all being left behind in favor of other things.

“But you need both imagination and analysis. Business people end up in those jobs because they are great at analysis. But, it’s like Dr. Spock and Captain Kirk – it wasn’t Spock who was the genius with great ideas, it was usually Kirk. You can’t analyze your way to a great idea – you can only see the path in retrospect. I would hope people would spend time developing their imaginative side to complement their analytical side.”

Jack’s Notebook is notable also for presenting the CPS process in a concrete and easy-to-grasp way. A meta-model for thinking and problem-solving that’s been around for about 50 years, CPS has always been considered something that you don’t pick up immediately. It’s complex and requires practice and the very melding of imagination and analytics that Fraley talks about. While there are many consultants offering CPS training and variations thereof, CPS training is most commonly taught at the CPSI conferences put on by the Creative Education Foundation. There, the basic “Springboard” training is usually at least three days long. (Disclaimer: I went through Springboard training at CPSI four years ago, and my company offers a training workshop based on a variation of CPS.)

Fraley, who has led Springboard training at CPSI for many years (though he was not my class leader), sees Jack’s Notebook as similar to Springboard because the characters in Jack’s Notebook go over and through the CPS process many times in solving problems that are critical to their lives. This is much the way Springboard works – small groups go over and over CPS in many iterations solving real-world problems that come out of the group. “Springboard is effective because it’s an emotional experience,” said Fraley.

Some reviewers have commented that in Jack’s Notebook, Fraley deviates from CPS for the sake of the more fast-moving narrative in the last third or so of the book. Not so, says he – the specific CPS model that he relies on is a fairly recent one modeled by Gerard Puccio of the International Center for Studies in Creativity at SUNY Buffalo State. “In Creative Leadership, Puccio classifies the steps in the CPS process in a slightly different way,” said Fraley. “He adds a diagnostic step.”

This diagnostic step involves determining exactly which part of the CPS process (Identifying the Challenge, Idea Generation, or Solution Development) you need to be in to handle the specific problem you are dealing with. Fraley’s version of the diagnostic step is what he calls in Jack’s Notebook a “Challenge Triage.” As the plot progresses and Jack becomes more fluent in CPS, he shows a corresponding fluidity with the Challenge Triage (which, like all the CPS principles Jack learns to use, is fully explained in the CPS Quick Reference Guide at the end of the book).

Fraley said he hopes that Jack’s Notebook will “take CPS to a whole new group of people. If you are a product manager, you’ve heard about this, these methods are not unheard of. The barista at Starbucks hasn’t heard of it. They don’t know that they need a better creative process – they only know that they’re stuck behind the bar....I was awestruck by how powerful CPS could be, but I was already 37 when I found out about it. Wouldn’t it be great to know a method for deliberate creativity when you’re young?”

Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Books | CPSI | Creativity | Training

January 3, 2006

Call for presenters: Creative Problem Solving Institute 2006

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

Happy New Year! Steve Dahlberg of the Creative Education Foundation asked me to post their call for leaders/presenters for 52nd International Creative Problem Solving Institute "(CPSI) 2006, to be held June 25 to 30, 2006, in Chicago. Deadline for proposals is January 15. More information can be had online at the CPSI Leader/Presenter FAQ.

Here are the published guidelines:

GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CPSI LEADERSHIP AND PRESENTING:

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we recognize that leadership is more than planning, organizing and facilitating. It's the ability to inspire others and to create experiences that enable them to grow and learn on their way to achieving objectives.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we understand the power of Creative Problem Solving, Applied Imagination, and creative thinking. We know that CPSI is more than the Osborn-Parnes Creative Problem Solving process. Yet this process continues to evolve and provides a sound, ongoing foundation for - and a link between - all our programs and other creativity concepts.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we are primarily customer-oriented, keeping in mind the needs, desires and concerns of our participants. This includes having a global perspective and appreciating and addressing the requirements of a multi-cultural community.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we stay current on the trends and developments in creativity, innovation and imagination, demonstrating a continuing ability to improve, enhance, innovate and re-invent.

* As leaders/presenters, we "walk the talk," modeling creativity values in words and actions.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we work effectively in teams.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we believe in CPSI and spread the word, inviting new participants to benefit from the CPSI experience.

* As CPSI leaders/presenters, we're willing and able to go the extra mile to contribute to the health and growth of the Creative Education Foundation.

If you are willing to lead/present in the spirit of these guidelines, please complete our online form for proposals and program leadership at: http://www.cpsiconference.com/proposal.cfm

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: CPSI

June 27, 2003

Flying on Buffalo Wings, Part 2

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

Connecting and blogging while here has been even more challenging than I suspected! But I'm going home today and I'll definitely be updating over the weekend to catch up....I've had a lot of interesting experiences and conversations, including a really fascinating one with some guys who presented on SIT, a very different creative problem-solving process than CPS that looks like it'll be a real paradigm shift if it catches on....I guess you could really call it "innovative creativity"!!

Comments (0) | Category: CPSI

June 25, 2003

Flying On Buffalo Wings, Part 1

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

I went to an impromptu night-time session called a "Nite Flite" on Monday night and had a terrific experience. Maybe I found this so terrific because I had a couple of beers before I went, but I've had a lot of non-drinking hours since then to think about it, and I still think it's great.


The presenter (again, it was Jon Pearson, the Robin Williams of creativity consulting) had us spend 15 seconds writing on a piece of paper a thought we had never had before. Later, at almost the end of the session, he asked us to turn the paper over and, again in about 15 seconds, write down a thought about the meaning of life.


Then at his instruction we crumpled up our papers, tossed them up in the air like Mary Tyler Moore's beret, and left the room! That was the end!


Later I talked to a fellow participant who said this exercise can be useful in ideation sessions and brainstorming meetings if everybody also is asked to pick up one of the random pieces of crumpled paper and use whatever is written there as a starting point from which to create.

Now I realize I found this so powerful because it reminded me of blogging. Isn't this what we're doing?! Writing bits of thoughts, both profound and not so profound, and sending them out for strangers to pick up at random and use as a starting point for their own thoughts....which they then send out too, and even better, an interesting conversation can be started between random blogging strangers (or would that be random strange bloggers!)....blogging of course is a much better distribution method than crumpling up your written thoughts and tossing them into the wind, or even making a paper airplane out of them and flying them off to Buffalo or wherever....!

Comments (0) | Category: CPSI

June 24, 2003

Shuffle Off To Buffalo

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

I'm in Buffalo, New York, which is oddly enough a hotbed of creativity (no, really!). Every summer the Creative Education Foundation holds its Creative Problem Solving Institute (CPSI) here, and I am here to continue the process of becoming certified as a CPS facilitator. I also have my daughters with me (15 and 17 years old), who are attending a "youth" version of CPSI.  And yes, we are all three staying in the same hotel room, a situation that in itself demands some amount of creative problem solving, especially innovative shower scheduling. But it's fun (no, really!).....for some reason having to do with the movie The Ice Storm they are this week referring to each other as Charles.


Posting will be chancy because I'm using a cranky laptop from my company's "pool" of road-use laptops and I'm on dial-up. But I'll keep at it as best I can.


I'm keeping my eye out for continuations of the creativity vs innovation conversation we've been having here. Innovation per se is rarely mentioned here -- CPSI is all about creativity, from becoming more creative yourself and making your company more creative, to practicing creativity as something of a religion. But to me, innovation (the subject) is lurking around every corner and subtexting every sentence.


Yesterday I went to a jaw-dropping session led by Jon Pearson (imagine Robin Williams as a teacher), and coming away from that I had the thought: Creativity has to do with seeing things differently. Innovation can be (though isn't always) the result, the changed behavior that occurs as a result of seeing things differently.

Comments (0) | Category: CPSI

February 7, 2003

Winterfest, Day 3: Graduation

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

Frank Patrick blogged on my reports from CPSI's Winterfest so far: "While I might quibble with her comment that a specific 'CPS process' is 'the basis for almost all other creativity and innovation processes,' as an example of common confusion of correllation for cause-and-effect, her description of cycles of convergence and divergence does apply to the TOC Thinking Processes, and probably serves as a common thread -- a meta process -- to any problem solving effort."


That's certainly a reasonable quibble. I did say "almost," though!


Patrick goes on to document similarities between TOC (Theory of Constraints) and CPS, mostly regarding the cycles of convergence and divergence I described yesterday. He ends, "In and out, up and down. Hopefully, not round and round."


My metaphor of the two-step dance didn't serve me as well there as it might have. "Round and round" isn't exactly correct, except in the sense that in solving a problem we are going 'round the hermeneutic circle (or spiral).


Patrick's absolutely right - an up and down motion is definitely at play. Part of our Springboard training was how to frame questions that would move the inquiry up and down. "Why" questions tend to build and move upward in more abstract directions. "How" questions drill downward; they focus and lead to specificity. This was described as moving "up and down the ladder."


But I don't want to give you all the impression that this was all work! We also played games that were meant to foster creativity, open our minds, bring us together as a team, and energize us. In one game we were all blindfolded and asked to find and pick up a rope, then arrange ourselves in a perfect sqaure while still blindfolded and holding on to the rope. The 16 of us managed to get square in 21 minutes.


In another very fascinating game we paired off and "sculpted" each other. That is, one person was "clay," allowing the other person to arrange their limbs whatever way they wanted (with some ground rules for the clay's comfort, of course!) that would showcase a "creative spirit" in the clay. This fostered an amazing sense of intimacy between the partners. The person who "sculpted" me looked at me more thoroughly and carefully than probably anyone has in a long long time, as she gently placed my limbs this way and that, trying to get at whatever she was seeing in me. Finally she stood back, cocked her head to one side, and muttered to herself, "Beautiful!"


We actually did have a little graduation ceremony, which we were allowed to plan ourselves. At the end we tossed our blindfolds (the ones we had used for the "making a square" game) in the air like some graduates toss their caps.


So ended Springboard training, though the conference goes on through the weekend with some "extending activities" scheduled. But I'm flying home tomorrow morning - my daughter is playing Yente the Matchmaker in her high school production of "Fiddler on the Roof" and I don't want to miss it!

Comments (0) | Category: CPSI

February 6, 2003

Winterfest, Day 2:Learning The CPS Two-Step

Email This Entry

Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

My question’s been answered: Our Springboard facilitators are teaching us the dance that gives CPS its power.


We’re also learning how to frame the questions that drive this process, and the tools that help all along the way. But the basic step is in fact a two-step:


Step One - Diverge, or make a list

  • Suspend judgment

  • Go for quantity

  • Seek wild and unusual ideas

  • Combine with other ideas

  • Write everything down

  • Step Two - Converge, or make choices

  • Improve ideas

  • Judge affirmatively

  • Be deliberate

  • Consider novelty

  • Check with your objectives

  • We dip and sway across complex problems, dancing in and out of the lists and lists and lists we make. Diverging and converging at every stage of the process. “Round and ‘round the problem we go, developing a goal statement here, honing a problem statement there, brainstorming criteria, facts, ideas, and, finally, a solution and an action plan.


    Tomorrow, we will practice on each other until hopefully by the end of the day we will not only be able to do this on our own, we will actually be graceful as we lead a client or a group through this dance.

    Comments (0) | Category: CPSI

    February 5, 2003

    Winterfest - Day 1 (updated)

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Renee Hopkins Callahan

    Sorry for the blog silence from here of late. In addition to watching hours of NASA press conferences (Ron Dittemore is now my hero, and I'm not alone there), I have been getting ready to travel to where I am now - in San Diego, at the Creative Problem-Solving Institute's Winterfest, which starts today.


    A little CPSI background: This foundation exists to teach creativity skills, most notably using the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) process developed by Dr. Sid Parnes and Alex Osborn (who coined the term "brainstorming"). CPS is the basis for almost all other creativity and innovation processes. It's also the basis for the Triz creativity and innovation software products.


    I'll spend the next three days with the same group of 18-22 participants also going through what's called Springboard training in CPS, since although I've had some creativity training, Springboard is a prerequisite for all other CPSI programs. Updates to follow!


    LATER #1:  While I was waiting for the opening remarks to begin, an older gentleman with a twinkle in his eye and no nametag hurried in and sat down at my table. "Hi, I'm Sid," he announced to us all. It was Dr. Sid Parnes, one of the creators of CPS. His main interest these days: Planning for next year's 50th anniversary of CPSI.


    LATER #2:  A terrific keynote presentation by Kerry Ruef of The Private Eye, and certainly the first time in years I've seen a presentation given using transparencies and an overhead projector! Ruef wielded these low-tech tools masterfully and artfully. We were each given bags containing two jeweler's loupes (singly, each offered 5X magnification; we put them together for 10X) and a variety of everyday items. Looking closely at an object through a jeweler's loupe, Ruef said, "helps strip the ordinary of its cliche."  She stepped us through her process of working with the questions ("What else does it remind me of? What else does it look like?")  she calls "the tools of the private eye." Next step: Use analogy and its "compressed forms - metaphor and simile" to theorize - and create. Powerful and fun.


    Here's Ruef in her own words:

      In a hot summer day, five years ago, I'd been thinking about the enormous power of the metaphor mind, the mind that sees the world but through the lens and network of analogy. The doors of my studio were open and bees sometimes swept in and began banging their heads against the skylight. The bamboo outside was rustling like taffeta skirts and it was an altogether lovely day to be thinking.


    LATER #3:  Springboard participants were split into groups, so we'll spend the remainder of the daytime sessions this week working with the same 20 or so people. Three facilitators led us through the six steps of CPS, teaching us at the same time the process and tips on how to facilitate the process in a group setting.


    I've already had some training in the "generate ideas" step since we use that in our ideation sessions, so I'm focusing on picking up more insights and tools there and learning more about the rest of the steps in the CPS process. The six steps are:

    1. Identify goal, wish, or challenge
    2. Gather data
    3. Clarify the problem
    4. Generate ideas
    5. Select and strengthen solutions
    6. Plan for action

    We'll be delving more into these six steps the next two days. It's clear to me that the CPS process is complex when done correctly, but still I wonder what we'll do to learn it that will take up two entire more days?!!

    Comments (0) | Category: CPSI